I don’t know what the hell the purpose of this is, but I’d like to add my voice to the chorus of people who feel the same way.
The news media is not a neutral entity, and it should not be.
Its a tool to spread information, not a source of information.
The news is being spread via a combination of misinformation, bias, and sensationalism.
It’s a tool that needs to be held accountable for the fact that it is a tool, not something that can be used to disseminate information.
It is important that news outlets be held to a higher standard than they are right now, and not be treated as mere appendages to an agenda that will eventually be shared and promoted.
If I were to make a case for why I think that the news media should be more like Wikipedia than The Onion, I’d argue that this is not an unreasonable position to take.
Wikipedia is a public encyclopedia that is accessible to the public at large, and yet it is considered by many to be the most biased and sensationalist news source on the internet.
The Onion is a site that has a much more private, less public, but much more biased perspective on the news, and has much less power over its readers.
The difference is that Wikipedia is the one that is used to spread the truth, while The Onion has the power to shape what readers think.
The only reason why the mainstream media isn’t held to the same standards is because it is not neutral in the eyes of the public.
In this case, I would argue that the power of The Onion and Wikipedia is in the fact they are both owned by the same entity.
Wikipedia, unlike The Onion in that it’s a private publication, is not beholden to anyone.
Its only purpose is to serve as a resource for the people to share information, and The Onion makes money from the sharing of information, even if they don’t agree with its content.
It isn’t a neutral source of news.
Its purpose is for a few people to have access to information that the public has, and the result of that is that the majority of people in this country have access, and most people can only access information from Wikipedia, which is what the mainstream news media relies on.
This isn’t about The Onion.
This is about the fact Wikipedia is owned by people, and Wikipedia itself is a private company.
I would argue the reason why mainstream media outlets don’t adhere to these standards is the same reason why it is possible to have a large audience without being a paid journalist, or a paid columnist, or even a paid political candidate.
The same reason that we can have a big audience without having a big influence over the direction of a nation’s politics.
The mainstream media can’t be neutral, they have to be paid for their services.
I think this is why so many people are angry about this whole thing.
I would love to see more outlets that are not beholdens to any one entity being held to similar standards.
You might be asking, why don’t I just leave the media to be an independent entity?
The answer is because there are too many people who would like to be controlled by a single entity.
To begin with, it’s hard to believe that the mainstream will stop supporting the media unless there is a change in direction.
The establishment press is a great example of this.
There is a huge amount of money in it, and they have very little incentive to be neutral.
When the establishment media started to go on a losing streak, it was mainly because the media was controlled by one entity, The Associated Press.
When it came to news, the media is a monopoly.
The AP has a vested interest in the outcome of the elections, and that is what they do, not what they say.
They have a huge financial interest in it because it gives them a huge audience.
The fact that the AP has been owned by an oligarch and its owner for so long has allowed them to control the news more than any other news outlet.
As the media becomes more and more reliant on its own financial support, it becomes more difficult to have an independent news outlet that has the same power as The Onion or Wikipedia.
As a result, many outlets will continue to rely on the financial support of one or two entities, and those entities will have more influence over how the news is disseminated.
This is why it’s important to understand the difference between what’s being presented in the mainstream and what is being presented to the general public.
The most popular news stories are being pushed by a few corporate giants.
It’s time for a change.
Reddit, the news aggregator that I mentioned earlier, is a platform that is dedicated to the sharing and sharing of the truth.
Reddit has a huge reach, and is known to have the highest user engagement rate in the internet, at over 1.3 billion monthly users.
It has a great community,