The headline is the same, but it’s worth noting that the title is different.
And here’s why: It is the first and only headline in a piece written by a reporter for Bloomberg View.
(The second is a tweet from the Bloomberg View account.)
The headline reads: “Is This Fake News?.”
The title is a phrase that’s been circulating online since December 2017.
A tweet from Bloomberg View, which has been a popular source of news and commentary for years, shows the phrase used by the reporter, Joe Romm.
Romm’s tweet read: “We found that people are using the phrase ‘fake news’ to mean that something is fake.
It is not a true statement.”
A reporter at Bloomberg View does not work for Bloomberg.
It’s a news organization owned by News Corp., a conglomerate that has a large presence in the media.
As such, a Bloomberg View reporter can’t directly control the story.
But the story they’ve chosen to tell is not the truth.
The Bloomberg article in question, for example, uses a term to describe what many believe to be fake news stories.
It says: “A few days ago, we published an article saying that a fake news story about the United States had spread widely online.
It was quickly removed.
It didn’t matter, it’s a fake story.
It doesn’t say what it’s saying.”
The article was published in the newsroom on Dec. 23, 2017, but the term “fake news” appears in the text of the article at the bottom of the story, and a link to the story is provided below.
(You can find the full text of this Bloomberg article here.)
The reporter who wrote the article in the Bloomberg article, Joe Rogan, is a regular guest on The View.
The broadcast on which Rogan appears is typically the one where he’s on as a guest, but Rogan did not appear on the broadcast on Dec 23, nor did he appear on Dec 22, nor would he appear again on Dec 21, 2017.
In fact, Rogan appeared on the show less than a week later.
Rogan has not previously spoken about his Twitter account, but he did tweet on Dec 29, 2017 that he was on The Daily Show on Dec 30, 2017 and that he had a conversation with a reporter about fake news.
The tweet was later deleted, but in its place was this message: “I apologize for the misspelling of my name.
If you see my tweet you can ask him directly.”
Rogan also retweeted a tweet by the same reporter on Dec 31, 2017 from an account called @Joe_Rogan_Show that claimed that the Trump administration had called a reporter who had published a false report about the president a “sick, sick f***er.”
(This tweet, which was subsequently deleted, is embedded below.)
Rogan’s Twitter account does not appear to be associated with the Bloomberg story.
On Dec 31 of 2017, Rogant also tweeted this tweet, from his account: “This morning I heard that @realDonaldTrump called the @JoeRoganShow ‘the sick f**kers’ show.
So I deleted it.
I hope you’re not sick.”
Rogant does not have a verified Twitter account.
In addition, Rogans Twitter account appears to have no history of using the hashtag #FakeNews.
In this Twitter account that Rogans has used, he has only tweeted the following tweet: “@Joe_Romm_Show, you got this.
That fake news, fake news about the @realDonaldTrump is so f***ing sick it’s sick.”
The tweet has been deleted from Rogans account.
This account does have a Twitter handle, but we’ve been unable to find any tweets from the account since March 2017.
The other tweet Rogans tweets, from the same account, is about the fake news from CNN and the “slam dunk” story that the New York Times published on Dec 27, 2017 about the Trump White House meeting.
Rogans also tweets about the story from The New York Post on Dec 26, 2017: “CNN is reporting that Trump is not attending the meeting because he is ‘out of the country.'”
Rogans tweet is also deleted from his Twitter.
Rogant’s tweet also appears to be deleted from The Washington Post, which he has a verified account.
Rogants tweets are not connected to the Bloomberg news story.
Rogance tweets are connected to a story on Fox News, but no one from Fox News has confirmed that Rogan tweets are related to the article.
Roganson is the only person to have retweeted Rogans posts, and he’s the only one to have posted a retweet of Rogans article, which Rogans retweeted.
It would be impossible for Roganson to know whether Rogans story was real or not without actually reading the article, but there’s no evidence that Roganson actually read the article itself.